-
NPI: A How To Guide for Engineers & Their Leaders
-
Leading from the Front
-
Marcel Tremblay: The Olympic Mindset & Engineering Leadership
-
Anurag Gupta: Framework to Accelerate NPI
-
Kyle Wiens on Why Design Repairability is Good for Business
-
Nathan Ackerman on NPI: Do The Hard Thing First
-
JDM Operational Excellence in NPI
-
Building the Team
-
Quality is Set in Development & Maintained in Production
-
3 Lessons from Tesla’s Former NPI Leader
-
Maik Duwensee: The Future of Hardware Integrity & Reliabilitypopular
-
Reject Fake NPI Schedules to Ship on Time
-
Leadership Guidance for Failure to Meet Exit Criteria
-
-
Screws & Glue: Getting Stuff Done
-
Choosing the best CAD software for product design
-
Screws vs Glues in Design, Assembly, & Repair
-
Best Practices for Glue in Electronics
-
A Practical Guide to Magnets
-
Inspection 101: Measurements
-
OK2Fly Checklists
-
Developing Your Reliability Test Suite
-
Guide to DOEs (Design of Experiments)
-
Ten Chinese phrases for your next build
-
-
NPI Processes & Workflows
-
-
Production: A Primer for Operations, Quality, & Their Leaders
-
Leading for Scale
-
Proven Strategies for Collaborating with Contract Manufacturers
-
Greg Reichow’s Manufacturing Process Performance Quadrants
-
8D Problem Solving: Sam Bowen Describes the Power of Stopping
-
Cut Costs by Getting Your Engineers in the Field
-
Garrett Bastable on Building Your Own Factory
-
Oracle Supply Chain Leader Mitigates Risk with Better Relationships
-
Brendan Green on Working with Manufacturers
-
Surviving Disaster: A Lesson in Quality from Marcy Alstott
-
-
Ship It!
-
Production Processes & Workflows
-
Failure Analysis Methods for Product Design Engineers: Tools and Techniques
-
-
Thinking Ahead: How to Evaluate New Technologies
-
How to Buy Software (for Hardware Leaders who Usually Don’t)
-
Adopting AI in the Aerospace and Defense Electronics Space
-
Build vs Buy: A Guide to Implementing Smart Manufacturing Technology
-
Leonel Leal on How Engineers Should Frame a Business Case for Innovation
-
Saw through the Buzzwords
-
Managed Cloud vs Self-Hosted Cloud vs On-Premises for Manufacturing Data
-
AOI, Smart AOI, & Beyond: Keyence vs Cognex vs Instrumentalpopular
-
Visual Inspection AI: AWS Lookout, Landing AI, & Instrumental
-
Manual Inspection vs. AI Inspection with Instrumentalpopular
-
Electronics Assembly Automation Tipping Points
-
CTO of ASUS: Systems Integrators for Manufacturing Automation Don't Scale
-
-
ROI-Driven Business Cases & Realized Value
-
-
Webinars and Live Event Recordings
-
Build Better 2024 Sessions On Demand
-
Superpowers for Engineers: Leveraging AI to Accelerate NPI | Build Better 2024
-
The Motorola Way, the Apple Way, and the Next Way | Build Better 2024
-
The Future of Functional Test: Fast, Scalable, Simple | Build Better 2024
-
Build Better 2024 Keynote | The Next Way
-
Principles for a Modern Manufacturing Technology Stack for Defense | Build Better 2024
-
What's Next for America's Critical Supply Chains | Build Better 2024
-
Innovating in Refurbishment, Repair, and Remanufacturing | Build Better 2024
-
Leading from the Front: The Missing Chapter for Hardware Executives | Build Better 2024
-
The Next Way for Reducing NPI Cycles | Build Better 2024
-
The State of Hardware 2025: 1,000 Engineers on Trends, Challenges, and Toolsets | Build Better 2024
-
Scaling Manufacturing: How Zero-to-One Lessons Unlock New Opportunities in Existing Operations | Build Better 2024
-
-
Design for Instrumental - Simple Design Ideas for Engineers to Get the Most from AI in NPI
-
Webinar | Shining Light on the Shadow Factory
-
How to Prepare for Tariffs in 2025: Leaders Share Lessons and Strategies
-
Tactics in Failure Analysis : A fireside chat with Dr. Steven Murray
-
Building the World's Most Reliable Products: Insights from Medical and Defense Leaders
Estimated reading time: · copy linkIt happens to us all: reliability tests are failing, and no matter how you look at the data, you can’t find the root cause. It’s a stressful moment for any engineer — especially for those designing life-saving products.
That’s why companies like Insulet Corporation, L3 Harris and Intuitive Surgical have embraced the need to combine rigorous reliability testing programs with quality management systems. They engineer products that have to function in high-pressure, life-altering situations, no matter the time of day or environment, and finding failures faster helps them better support their customers. David Nazzaro of Insulet Corporation, Michael Sternowski of L3 Harris, and Matt Ohline of Intuitive Surgical joined Sam Weiss, CTO and co-founder of Instrumental, to discuss building some of the world’s most reliable products.
Proactive data is critical to identifying unexpected issues
For Matt Ohline, senior director of process engineering at Intuitive Surgical, the ability to build better products, like their Da Vinci robotic surgical system, depends on data. This concept hit home for him while his team attempted to solve a common challenge in manufacturing: operator errors. One of their manufacturing systems was designed to interact with operators, yet despite careful design, some operators skipped an important performance test.
Matt's team had data from quality control systems that alerted them to the issue in the first place. Thanks to track and trace manufacturing, they were able to identify the units affected by the operator error and quarantined them for retest. This enabled them avoid a recall. “Our devices need to function as designed every time,” he said, and ensuring you have data with proactive alerting ensures that happens.
No shortcuts to functional and reliability testing
Michael Sternowski is interim director of quality at L3 Harris, a company that develops tactical radio systems for deployed troops. His team is charged with building a product that withstands many rigorous environmental conditions -- so reliability testing is an absolute requirement. Design verification testing and extensive field testing is a critical part of their manufacturing process and product success.
Just how much testing do they do? “For every 45 minutes of assembly time, we’re probably doing six times that in parametric testing to ensure every channel across the board performs properly.” While he wasn't able to share how many units got through destructive tests at L3, it's common for mission-critical electronics manufacturers to send more than 50% of their development allocation to destructive tests.
Regulatory standards are your friend
While some may complain about the strict engineering regulations imposed on medical and defense products, Dave Nazzaro, vice president of hardware engineering and advanced technologies at Insulet Corporation, embraces them. Insulet makes the Omnipod, a small patch pump that enables insulin management for those with diabetes. He recommends that all companies follow Insulet’s lead: encourage team members to learn from the governing bodies that develop industry standards.
The panelists agreed that viewing regulatory standards as support can help companies raise the bar on their design and quality standards and use them as a template for a resilient product. “[Getting involved with regulatory boards] helps us learn about the standards before they’re released and network with people trying to solve the same problems as we are.”