-
NPI: A How To Guide for Engineers & Their Leaders
-
Leading from the Front
-
Marcel Tremblay: The Olympic Mindset & Engineering Leadershippopular
-
Anurag Gupta: Framework to Accelerate NPI
-
Kyle Wiens on Why Design Repairability is Good for Business
-
Nathan Ackerman on NPI: Do The Hard Thing First
-
JDM Operational Excellence in NPI
-
Building the Team
-
Quality is Set in Development & Maintained in Production
-
3 Lessons from Tesla’s Former NPI Leader
-
Maik Duwensee: The Future of Hardware Integrity & Reliability
-
Reject Fake NPI Schedules to Ship on Time
-
Leadership Guidance for Failure to Meet Exit Criteria
-
-
Screws & Glue: Getting Stuff Done
-
Choosing the best CAD software for product design
-
Screws vs Glues in Design, Assembly, & Repair
-
Best Practices for Glue in Electronics
-
A Practical Guide to Magnets
-
Inspection 101: Measurements
-
OK2Fly Checklists
-
Developing Your Reliability Test Suite
-
Guide to DOEs (Design of Experiments)
-
Ten Chinese phrases for your next build
-
-
NPI Processes & Workflows
-
-
Production: A Primer for Operations, Quality, & Their Leaders
-
Leading for Scale
-
Proven Strategies for Collaborating with Contract Manufacturers
-
Greg Reichow’s Manufacturing Process Performance Quadrants
-
8D Problem Solving: Sam Bowen Describes the Power of Stopping
-
Cut Costs by Getting Your Engineers in the Field
-
Garrett Bastable on Building Your Own Factory
-
Oracle Supply Chain Leader Mitigates Risk with Better Relationships
-
Brendan Green on Working with Manufacturers
-
Surviving Disaster: A Lesson in Quality from Marcy Alstott
-
-
Ship It!
-
Production Processes & Workflows
-
Failure Analysis Methods for Product Design Engineers: Tools and Techniques
-
-
Thinking Ahead: How to Evaluate New Technologies
-
How to Buy Software (for Hardware Leaders who Usually Don’t)
-
Adopting AI in the Aerospace and Defense Electronics Space
-
Build vs Buy: A Guide to Implementing Smart Manufacturing Technology
-
Leonel Leal on How Engineers Should Frame a Business Case for Innovation
-
Saw through the Buzzwords
-
Managed Cloud vs Self-Hosted Cloud vs On-Premises for Manufacturing Data
-
AOI, Smart AOI, & Beyond: Keyence vs Cognex vs Instrumentalpopular
-
Visual Inspection AI: AWS Lookout, Landing AI, & Instrumental
-
Manual Inspection vs. AI Inspection with Instrumentalpopular
-
Electronics Assembly Automation Tipping Points
-
CTO of ASUS: Systems Integrators for Manufacturing Automation Don't Scale
-
-
ROI-Driven Business Cases & Realized Value
-
-
Webinars and Live Event Recordings
-
Build Better 2024 Sessions On Demand
-
Superpowers for Engineers: Leveraging AI to Accelerate NPI | Build Better 2024
-
The Motorola Way, the Apple Way, and the Next Way | Build Better 2024
-
The Future of Functional Test: Fast, Scalable, Simple | Build Better 2024
-
Build Better 2024 Keynote | The Next Way
-
Principles for a Modern Manufacturing Technology Stack for Defense | Build Better 2024
-
What's Next for America's Critical Supply Chains | Build Better 2024
-
Innovating in Refurbishment, Repair, and Remanufacturing | Build Better 2024
-
Leading from the Front: The Missing Chapter for Hardware Executives | Build Better 2024
-
The Next Way for Reducing NPI Cycles | Build Better 2024
-
The State of Hardware 2025: 1,000 Engineers on Trends, Challenges, and Toolsets | Build Better 2024
-
Scaling Manufacturing: How Zero-to-One Lessons Unlock New Opportunities in Existing Operations | Build Better 2024
-
-
Design for Instrumental - Simple Design Ideas for Engineers to Get the Most from AI in NPI
-
Webinar | Shining Light on the Shadow Factory
-
How to Prepare for Tariffs in 2025: Leaders Share Lessons and Strategies
-
Tactics in Failure Analysis : A fireside chat with Dr. Steven Murray
-
Managed Cloud vs Self-Hosted Cloud vs On-Premises for Manufacturing Data
Estimated reading time: · copy linkWhen I first started Instrumental in 2015, I was told by many brands and manufacturers: “There is no way we would ever put our manufacturing data into the cloud.” Full stop.
My response then is the same as it is now: “You will if there’s enough value to doing so.”
Fast forward a decade and a few things have changed:
- Awareness of the power of AI has made it clear that AI will transform manufacturing, but a pre-requisite is having an accessible and organized dataset. So even if those AIs don’t exist today, it’s widely acknowledged that they will come, so it’s valuable to start getting the datasets ready now.
- Cloud technology has continued to mature, providing a wide variety of highly secure options, such as ITAR and FedRAMP–compliant cloud products.
- On-premises technology has stagnated – new technologies are not being developed for this platform and the operational overhead remains high.
Manufacturing data is inherently multi-premise – it must be in the cloud
Instrumental’s vision has always been to tie together and extract value from the digital exhaust of the NPI and manufacturing process – across SKUs, products, lines, global sites, and many suppliers. Our most valuable work since our inception has been in manufacturing processes with multi-site scale – such as capturing data from upstream suppliers, FATP, and returns and refurbishment – or in capturing data from multiple SKUs, lines, and factory sites. Since manufacturing is inherently a “cause and effect” process – you want both the “causes” from upstream and the “effects” from downstream in the same system to analyze. By its very nature, this is a problem that cannot be constrained to one “premise” – it’s multi-premise. On-premises will not be the future of manufacturing data. It’s got to be in the cloud.
For many companies, managed, multi-tenant clouds using state-of-the-art security and separation protocols work great. They benefit from aggregating manufacturing data across many sites, massive cloud scalability, and access to cutting-edge technologies that deploy and provide payback within weeks.
But there are many very valid reasons to need to keep data on-premises: contractual requirements, compliance, regulations, etc. So, what should a leader do?
Get off the sidelines with Self-Hosted Cloud for manufacturing data
There are a few reasons managed cloud may not be tenable for your business:
- Perhaps the underlying data is your customer’s data. You can use it to improve their product, but to bring in a third-party technology will require a painful three-way negotiation.
- You have contractual requirements that prohibit allowing the data to leave your systems, or uncapped liability if you do so.
- Standards like ITAR, NIST SP 800-171, FedRAMP have specific restrictions on access and controls that commercial systems cannot handle – it’s a non-starter.
Unfortunately, these have left many manufacturers on the sidelines of all of the activity and benefits of using third parties for manufacturing analytics and manufacturing AI. The cutting-edge advances in technologies are not being built for on-premises platforms.
The answer is simple: if a managed cloud cannot work for your business, a self-hosted one probably can.
How does a Self-Hosted Cloud work for manufacturing data?
In a self-hosted cloud environment, your IT team creates an isolated cloud environment – such as inside your organization’s implementation of AWS. Your third-party vendor deploys a copy of their software to run within that environment and to connect everything up to internal and external services or sub-processors. Your IT team controls all administrative access to the cloud environment, and everything coming in and going out, so they are able to ensure it meets all regulatory, security, and compliance requirements. Your may allow your vendor to have temporary access to certain elements of the environment or the software itself, but you maintain complete control of your data.
Instrumental’s Self-Hosted Cloud offering
You can run Instrumental’s manufacturing data and AI platform in either an Instrumental-managed cloud environment or a self-hosted environment. Why might you choose one or the other?
Instrumental’s secure, managed cloud environment is well-suited for companies who value speed and maximizing the ROI of a technology implementation. Part of Instrumental’s service includes the operational management of the cloud environment and data processing – so you don’t need IT team involvement to get set-up and running. The cloud environment itself meets or exceeds best practices for enterprise cloud security and a new program can be up and running in days. Getting support or updates is fast and easy. These implementations are also cheaper because the operational costs of administering them are shared amongst many customers. Instrumental provides both commercial and ITAR-compliant GovCloud managed environments.
Instrumental’s self-host option for AWS is well-suited for companies with contractual, regulatory, or compliance requirements that cannot be met in one of our managed environments. It maintains the benefits of a cloud environment by allowing aggregation of data from multiple places but remains within your castle of security and compliance. Your environment will typically have bespoke requirements, leading to higher costs and a longer duration for implementation. You’ll also be paying AWS directly to host your environment. However, once implemented, your team will have instantaneous access to their data and Instrumental’s powerful AI tools. You’ll still be able to enjoy remote support from our world-class team of experts and a strong return on your technology investment.
If you would like to learn more, speak with a build better engineer.