-
NPI: A How To Guide for Engineers & Their Leaders
-
Leading from the Front
-
Building the Team
-
Screws & Glue: Getting Stuff Done
-
Choosing the best CAD software for product design
-
Screws vs Glues in Design, Assembly, & Repair
-
Best Practices for Glue in Electronics
-
A Practical Guide to Magnets
-
Inspection 101: Measurements
-
A Primer on Color Matching
-
OK2Fly Checklists
-
Developing Your Reliability Test Suite
-
Guide to DOEs (Design of Experiments)
-
Ten Chinese phrases for your next build
-
-
NPI Processes & Workflows
-
-
Production: A Primer for Operations, Quality, & Their Leaders
-
Steven Nickel on How Google Designs for Repair
-
Leading for Scale
-
Petcube’s Alex Neskin Embraces Imperfection to Deliver Innovation
-
Proven Strategies for Collaborating with Contract Manufacturers
-
Greg Reichow’s Manufacturing Process Performance Quadrants
-
8D Problem Solving: Sam Bowen Describes the Power of Stopping
-
Cut Costs by Getting Your Engineers in the Field
-
Garrett Bastable on Building Your Own Factory
-
Oracle Supply Chain Leader Mitigates Risk with Better Relationships
-
Brendan Green on Working with Manufacturers
-
Surviving Disaster: A Lesson in Quality from Marcy Alstott
-
-
Ship It!
-
Production Processes & Workflows
-
-
Thinking Ahead: How to Evaluate New Technologies
-
How to Buy Software (for Hardware Leaders who Usually Don’t)
-
Adopting AI in the Aerospace and Defense Electronics Space
-
Build vs Buy: A Guide to Implementing Smart Manufacturing Technology
-
Leonel Leal on How Engineers Should Frame a Business Case for Innovation
-
Saw through the Buzzwords
-
Managed Cloud vs Self-Hosted Cloud vs On-Premises for Manufacturing Data
-
AOI, Smart AOI, & Beyond: Keyence vs Cognex vs Instrumentalpopular
-
Visual Inspection AI: AWS Lookout, Landing AI, & Instrumental
-
Manual Inspection vs. AI Inspection with Instrumentalpopular
-
Electronics Assembly Automation Tipping Points
-
CTO of ASUS: Systems Integrators for Manufacturing Automation Don't Scale
-
-
ROI-Driven Business Cases & Realized Value
-
-
Webinars and Live Event Recordings
-
Materials Planning: The Hidden Challenges of Factory Transitions
-
Build Better 2024 Sessions On Demand
-
Superpowers for Engineers: Leveraging AI to Accelerate NPI | Build Better 2024
-
The Motorola Way, the Apple Way, and the Next Way | Build Better 2024
-
The Future of Functional Test: Fast, Scalable, Simple | Build Better 2024
-
Build Better 2024 Keynote | The Next Way
-
Principles for a Modern Manufacturing Technology Stack for Defense | Build Better 2024
-
What's Next for America's Critical Supply Chains | Build Better 2024
-
Innovating in Refurbishment, Repair, and Remanufacturing | Build Better 2024
-
Leading from the Front: The Missing Chapter for Hardware Executives | Build Better 2024
-
The Next Way for Reducing NPI Cycles | Build Better 2024
-
-
The State of Hardware 2025: 1,000 Engineers on Trends, Challenges, and Toolsets | Build Better 2024
-
Build Better Fireside Chats
-
Aerospace and Defense: Headwinds & Tailwinds for Electronics Manufacturing in 2025
-
From Counterfeits to Sanctions: Securing Your Supply Chain in an Era of Conflict
-
Design for Instrumental - Simple Design Ideas for Engineers to Get the Most from AI in NPI
-
Webinar | Shining Light on the Shadow Factory
-
Tactics in Failure Analysis : A fireside chat with Dr. Steven Murray
-
-
Preparing for Tariffs in 2025: Resources for Electronics Manufacturers
-
How to Prepare for Tariffs in 2025: Leaders Share Lessons and Strategies
-
As Google's leader of hardware repair operations and a veteran of consumer electronics with extensive experience at Sony, Steven Nickel brings decades of perspective on how field repair data can drive product excellence. His journey from human resources to product marketing to repair operations spans multiple companies and continents, offering valuable insights into the evolution of consumer electronics repair and its crucial role in product development.
When Steven first stepped onto a factory floor early in his career, he had the opportunity to meet a former NFL player working on the assembly line. “How would you compare this to what you had in the NFL?” The answer was that, when things would break down on the field and the game was going wrong, coaches would run in, ask what’s going on, and gather as much information as possible. But in factories, the engineers didn’t seek out information from the operators - they would just try to solve the issue on their own. This perspective would shape Steven's approach throughout his career, influencing Google's innovative distributed repair strategy for its hardware products.
Watch the full fireside chat with Steven here:
The Evolution of Google’s Repair Strategy
Google's approach to repair began with a fundamental question: how to align repair services with the company's core mission of making information useful and accessible. "When you think about that in the context of repair, what does that mean to be useful and accessible?" Steven recalled. The answer led to a distributed repair strategy that would prioritize customer convenience and environmental sustainability. This customer focus has enabled Google to emerge as a leader in progressive repair policies and shows how repair can transform from a legal requirement into a powerful driver of product improvement and customer loyalty.
Establishing a Distributed Network of Repair Partners
Rather than centralizing repairs in distant facilities where the labor might be cheaper and specialized tooling would be possible, Google opted to build a network of local repair partners.
Steven explains, “How do we connect with customers wherever they are? By building deep relationships with third-party partners to provide repair services in local communities, the Google team is able to provide same-day service and convenience for customers with less environmental impact.
Distributed Repair Strategy Drives Design for Repairability
The distributed repair model created a powerful incentive for internal improvement in Design for Repairability – if the devices were too difficult to repair or required too much specialized equipment, it wouldn’t work. "When you go to that model, it just puts the burden on you to design your products to be easy to repair," Steven notes. "They repair a lot of other things. You've got to make it easy to repair."
This commitment to repairability has influenced product design in tangible ways, from standardizing screws to minimizing proprietary tools. While these improvements simplify repair for their third-party partners, those design changes also improve upstream repair processes – like FATP rework – reducing labor costs and rework scrap rates.
Bridging the Gap Between Design, Engineering, and the Field
One of the most striking aspects of Google's approach is the regular interaction between repair operations and design teams. The eventual goal is to move to a point where interaction is regular and feedback is just a ping away. This collaboration between teams extends years into the future, with Steven participating in current discussions around products whose releases are still years away.
One of the most effective tools for driving design improvements is hands-on experience. Steven organizes teardown sessions where leadership and product teams attempt repairs themselves. "When you sponsor those, they will pay off for years," he notes. "You will hear from those leaders in meetings saying, 'I remember when I struggled with that. How can we make that better?'"
Another effective source of design improvements is leveraging data from repair, call centers, and field quality. With deep analysis, this raw data can become insights that drive product improvements.
Making The Business Case for Repairability
While repair might seem like a cost center, Steven argues it presents unique opportunities. "It's the only part in the operations world where you've got both a cost savings and a revenue generation opportunity," he explained. The cost savings come from operational efficiencies, while revenue opportunities arise from enhanced customer relationships, whether through extended warranties or accessory sales.
Rather than cannibalizing new product sales, a common objection in the fight for repairability, robust repair programs can expand the customer base. "As devices last longer, what you're really just doing is you're generating this opportunity to expand your customer base," Steven argues. Repaired devices can find new homes through hand-me-downs or donations, potentially creating aspirational customers for new products.
The repair experience has become increasingly important for brand loyalty. Imagining himself as a customer, Steven muses, “I'm gonna need repair at some point, and when I do, I want to know that the company is going to support it."
The Future of Electronics Repair is Consumer Repair
Looking ahead, Steven sees a growing movement toward DIY repair. "People want more agency. They want more ability to repair their own things," he observed, a trend that aligns with both cultural shifts and business opportunities. "When you enable people to do it, you're building a relationship with the product as well. You're connected to it because you fixed it, and now it can last longer."
Leading on Repairability as a Competitive Advantage
Google's approach to repair demonstrates how a repair strategy deployed with a solid business case and demonstrable ROI can align with company values while driving business success. Through distributed networks, design collaboration, and careful attention to customer feedback, they've transformed repair from a necessary service into a powerful tool for product improvement and customer loyalty.
As the right-to-repair movement gains momentum and sustainability concerns grow, Google's experience offers valuable lessons for the industry and has demonstrated that success in hardware isn't just about designing great products—it's about supporting those products throughout their entire lifecycle, learning from field experience, and using those insights to drive continuous improvement.
The future of electronics repair, as Steven envisions it, is one where repair becomes more accessible, sustainable, and integrated into the product development cycle. Companies that embrace repair as a strategic advantage rather than a legal mandate will be better positioned to build lasting customer relationships and drive product excellence.